(Photo credit: Scott Sommerdorf | The Salt Lake Tribune) |
I struggled with this when we were discussing an open space bond. If we are asking residents to pay for open space, parks, trails, and recreation through a general obligation bond, I want to make sure those dollars stretch as far as possible for those particular uses.
I believe there is community value in having nice buildings and public art. Art and culture in a community enhance education, improve quality of life, and attract businesses who are looking for a great place to locate employees and grow.
But should there be a 1 percent art allocation for every county building? I don't believe so.
Right now this ordinance is interpreted as a hard and fast rule and the full 1 percent is spent, even in non-public buildings. (The Salt Lake County Fleet Building is a prime example.) When future county buildings are built, we need to use a common sense approach and allocate art funding based on public use.
I support having art in our libraries, senior centers, and other places where it benefits the public. We want to have nice buildings that enhance a community. Even in those instances, 1 percent may be too much, depending on the project. I believe we need to take it on a case-by-case basis.
Aimee. I agree with you. We should prioritize and especially on a case by case basis. Even then there are many budding artists that would donate and not at tax payers expense. Thank you for being responsible in this matter and looking out for the tax payers.
ReplyDelete